124 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
124 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# Backward incompatible migrations
|
|
|
|
The linter analyses your migrations and checks the SQL for:
|
|
|
|
- Added `NOT NULL` columns, which don't have a DEFAULT value
|
|
- Dropping columns
|
|
- Dropping tables
|
|
- Renaming columns
|
|
- Renaming tables
|
|
- Altering columns (which can be backward compatible and potentially ignored)
|
|
- Adding a unique constraint
|
|
|
|
Those are the most important and frequent backward incompatible migrations.
|
|
We are happy to add more if you can specify them to us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Warnings
|
|
|
|
On data migrations, the linter will show a warning when:
|
|
* you are missing a reverse migration
|
|
* the RunPython arguments do not respect the naming convention `apps, schema_editor`
|
|
* the model variable name is different from the model class name in the `get_model` call
|
|
|
|
## Codes
|
|
|
|
You can ignore checks through the `--exclude-migration-tests` option by specifying any of the codes:
|
|
|
|
| Code | Description | Default type |
|
|
|------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|
|
| `NOT_NULL` | Not NULL constraint on columns | Error |
|
|
| `DROP_COLUMN` | Dropping columns | Error |
|
|
| `DROP_TABLE` | Dropping tables | Error |
|
|
| `RENAME_COLUMN` | Renaming columns | Error |
|
|
| `RENAME_TABLE` | Renaming tables | Error |
|
|
| `ALTER_COLUMN` | Altering columns (could be backward compatible) | Error |
|
|
| `ADD_UNIQUE` | Add unique constraints | Error |
|
|
| `RUNPYTHON_REVERSIBLE` | RunPython data migration is not reversible (missing reverse code) | Warning |
|
|
| `RUNPYTHON_ARGS_NAMING_CONVENTION` | By convention, RunPython names two arguments: apps, schema_editor | Warning |
|
|
| `RUNPYTHON_MODEL_IMPORT` | Missing apps.get_model() calls for model | Error |
|
|
| `RUNPYTHON_MODEL_VARIABLE_NAME` | The model variable name is different from the model class itself | Warning |
|
|
| `RUNSQL_REVERSIBLE` | RunSQL data migration is not reversible (missing reverse SQL) | Warning |
|
|
| `CREATE_INDEX` | (Postgresql specific) Creating an index without the concurrent keyword will lock the table and may generate downtime | Warning |
|
|
| `DROP_INDEX` | (Postgresql specific) Dropping an index without the concurrent keyword will lock the table and may generate downtime | Warning |
|
|
| `REINDEX` | (Postgresql specific) Reindexing will lock the table and may generate downtime | Warning |
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Details about backward incompatibilities
|
|
|
|
This section will go into the depth of the different check the migration linter makes.
|
|
The base hypotheses of these cases are:
|
|
- in a production system, you cannot deploy your database(s) (DB) and code server(s) simultaneously
|
|
- you deploy your DB first, as there are very few cases in which deploying the code first is viable for database operations
|
|
|
|
### Adding `NOT NULL` column without default value
|
|
|
|
A frequent and error-prone operation is adding a non-nullable column to an existing table.
|
|
|
|
First, adding a `NOT NULL` column **without any default value** is problematic.
|
|
|
|
**Forward migration**:
|
|
1. update your DB to add a `NOT NULL` column
|
|
2. your Django code will not specify the new column when inserting a row
|
|
=> error `column cannot be null`
|
|
3. once the code updated, insertion will work where the new column has explicitly been specified
|
|
|
|
**Rollback**: in the case of a rollback, you will encounter the same errors.
|
|
|
|
**Incorrect solution**: specify a default value in the Django model field.
|
|
One would think that adding a default value in Django will prevent these errors.
|
|
|
|
A common misconception is that the Django default value is translated to a database default.
|
|
But Django actually uses the default value to fill existing rows and set an unspecified column value to its default.
|
|
The latter is done at the application level, by Django - and the database default value was dropped during migration.
|
|
You can read more about this in the [Django and its default values blog post](https://medium.com/botify-labs/django-and-its-default-values-c21a13cff9f).
|
|
|
|
**Forward migration**:
|
|
1. update your DB to add a `NOT NULL` column with a Django default
|
|
2. your Django code will not specify the new column when inserting a row, and Django is not aware of the default value
|
|
=> error `column cannot be null`
|
|
3. once the code updated, insertion will work
|
|
|
|
**Rollback**: in the case of a rollback, you will encounter the same errors
|
|
|
|
**Solutions**:
|
|
- Make the column nullable
|
|
- Set a database default using Django's [RunSQL](https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/ref/migration-operations/#django.db.migrations.operations.RunSQL)
|
|
- Set a database default using [django-add-default-value](https://github.com/3YOURMIND/django-add-default-value/)
|
|
|
|
### Dropping a column
|
|
|
|
Deletion operations often lead to errors during deployment.
|
|
|
|
**Forward migration**:
|
|
1. update your DB to drop a column
|
|
2. your code will crash retrieving rows from this table (because Django explicits all column names when fetching a model object)
|
|
3. once the code is updated, the errors should cease
|
|
|
|
**Rollback**:
|
|
1. rollback your code
|
|
2. your code will crash retrieving rows from this table (because Django explicits all column names when fetching a model object)
|
|
3. rollback your DB to re-create the column
|
|
4. restore a backup of your data (if available and fresh enough)
|
|
|
|
**Solutions**:
|
|
- Deprecate the column before dropping it using [django-deprecate-fields](https://github.com/3YOURMIND/django-deprecate-fields/)
|
|
- Don't actually drop the column, but fake the drop migration until you are sure you won't roll back.
|
|
Be careful /!\ fake dropping a non-nullable column without a database default will create errors once the code is not aware of the column anymore.
|
|
|
|
### Others
|
|
|
|
To be added...
|
|
|
|
## The special case of sqlite
|
|
|
|
While on PostgreSQL and MySQL a table modification can be expressed by one `ALTER TABLE` statement, sqlite is handled in a different way.
|
|
For operations like adding a column to an existing table, Django actually generates four statements:
|
|
- creating a new table with the new schema
|
|
- copying all rows from the current table to the new one
|
|
- dropping the current table
|
|
- renaming the new table to the current table name
|
|
|
|
At the time of writing, the linter doesn't support a fine-grained detection of field alteration when using the sqlite process.
|
|
An [issue #142](https://github.com/3YOURMIND/django-migration-linter/issues/142) is already open and Django also has a [ticket about supporting sqlite ALTER functions](https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/32502).
|